Book of Ra pioneered expanding symbol mechanics that Book of Dead perfected. Choose the refinement, not the original.
Released in 2005 by Novomatic, Book of Ra introduced the expanding symbol free spins concept that became industry standard. The game achieved legendary status across German-speaking European markets, building devoted player bases sustaining popularity for nearly 20 years despite dated 2005 graphics and 95.10% RTP that sits below contemporary standards.
Why does Book of Ra remain popular when superior alternatives exist?
Because nostalgia and cultural timing beat mathematics for certain audiences. Book of Ra became synonymous with online slots for German and Austrian players during the mid-2000s digital transition, creating first-mover brand advantage that mathematical disadvantages cannot overcome. The game holds genuine historical significance as the template countless Egyptian slots followed, including Book of Dead which refined Book of Ra’s formula with superior 96.21% RTP, enhanced graphics, and better volatility balance.
However, historical importance doesn’t equal optimal current choice. Book of Dead implements identical expanding symbol mechanics with superior mathematics (96.21% vs 95.10%), modern production values, and wider UK market recognition. Unless nostalgia specifically drives your choice or you’re playing in German-speaking markets where Book of Ra holds cultural significance, Book of Dead represents objectively superior alternative.
This review examines Book of Ra’s actual characteristics—the pioneering mechanics that established templates countless games followed, the 95.10% RTP that guarantees £4.90 lost per £100 wagered, the medium-high volatility demanding substantial bankrolls, and the dated 2005 presentation that shows age against contemporary alternatives. We’ll determine whether Book of Ra’s historical significance justifies choosing it over mechanically-identical but mathematically-superior successors.
Book of Ra Slot Specifications
Provider: Novomatic (Greentube digital division)
Release Date: 2005 (original), 2008 (Deluxe version)
Reels: 5 reels, 3 rows
Paylines: 9 (original), 10 (Deluxe)
RTP: 95.10% (standard) / up to 97.00% (Deluxe configurable)
Volatility: Medium-High
Maximum Win: 5,000x stake
Minimum Bet: £0.09 (9 lines at 1p each)
Maximum Bet: Varies by operator
Feature Frequency: ~150-250 spins average
Bonus Features: Free Spins with Expanding Symbol
Free Spins: 10 initial (retriggerable)
Mobile Compatible: Yes (modern HTML5 versions)
Best Book of Ra Slot Sites UK
Book of Ra appears less frequently at UK online casinos compared to alternatives like Book of Dead due to Novomatic’s stronger European continental presence versus UK market penetration. When available, it typically appears alongside other Novomatic/Greentube titles. See our comprehensive casino reviews and comparisons to find operators featuring Book of Ra.
Book of Ra RTP and Expected Losses
Book of Ra’s 95.10% RTP represents the game’s most significant mathematical disadvantage versus contemporary alternatives. This percentage sits 0.90-1.40% below modern industry standards of 96.00-96.50%, creating substantial value differences across extended play.
Real expected losses on Book of Ra (95.10% RTP):
- £100 wagered = £4.90 expected loss
- £500 wagered = £24.50 expected loss
- £1,000 wagered = £49.00 expected loss
Comparing to Book of Dead (96.21% RTP):
- £100 wagered = £3.79 expected loss (£1.11 better than Book of Ra)
- £500 wagered = £18.95 expected loss (£5.55 better)
- £1,000 wagered = £37.90 expected loss (£11.10 better)
Notice how the 1.11% RTP difference compounds dramatically. Over 1,000 spins at £1 per spin, Book of Dead costs £11.10 less purely from superior mathematics. This difference proves substantial—equivalent to approximately 11 additional spins funded purely by better RTP.
Book of Ra Deluxe’s configurable RTP (up to 97%):
The Deluxe version permits operators selecting RTP configurations from 95.10% through 97.00%. However, most operators implement lower configurations (95.10% or 95.50%) rather than maximum 97% settings. Always verify actual RTP through game information screens rather than assuming optimal configuration.
At maximum 97% configuration, Book of Ra Deluxe offers:
- £100 wagered = £3.00 expected loss (better than Book of Dead’s £3.79)
- £500 wagered = £15.00 expected loss (£3.95 better than Book of Dead)
- £1,000 wagered = £30.00 expected loss (£7.90 better than Book of Dead)
If playing 97% RTP Book of Ra Deluxe, the mathematics surpass Book of Dead substantially. However, confirming 97% configuration proves essential—most implementations use lower settings negating this advantage.
Comparing Book of Ra’s RTP to other SlotGamer-reviewed games:
- Book of Dead: 96.21% (substantially better)
- Legacy of Dead: 96.58% (substantially better)
- Gonzo’s Quest: 96.00% (better)
- Starburst: 96.09% (better)
- Rainbow Riches: 95.00% (worse)
Book of Ra’s 95.10% RTP proves inferior to most modern alternatives. No strategy overcomes house edge. The expanding symbol mechanics don’t influence long-term returns—all approaches face identical negative expectation ensuring losses over sufficient play.
Understanding Book of Ra’s Pioneering Expanding Symbol Mechanic
Book of Ra pioneered the expanding symbol free spins concept that Book of Dead, Legacy of Dead, and countless others subsequently refined. Understanding this mechanic’s operation explains both Book of Ra’s historical significance and why successors improved upon it.
Free Spins Activation
Landing three or more book scatter symbols anywhere on the reels triggers 10 free spins. The book symbol serves dual purposes:
- Scatter pays: 2+ books award instant scatter payments (2 books = 2x bet, 3 books = 10x bet, 4 books = 100x bet, 5 books = 200x bet)
- Feature trigger: 3+ books activate free spins
This dual functionality makes book appearances valuable through both immediate payments and feature activation potential, creating excitement around book landings central to playing experience.
Expanding Symbol Selection and Mechanics
Upon free spins activation, the game randomly selects one symbol from the paytable as the expanding symbol for all 10 spins. This selection proves critical—the chosen symbol determines maximum feature potential.
How expanding symbols actually work:
- Free spin completes with standard evaluation for payline wins
- If the designated expanding symbol appears anywhere on reels, it expands vertically filling entire reel(s)
- Second evaluation occurs with expanded symbols covering full reel heights
- Critical difference from standard pays: Expanded symbols pay SCATTERED—they don’t require payline positions, only presence on reels
- Wins calculate based on quantity present across any positions
Example demonstrating scattered pay power:
Expanding symbol selected: Explorer (highest-value symbol)
- Free spin outcome: Explorer lands on reels 1, 3, and 5 in random row positions
- Expansion: Explorers expand covering all three reels completely
- Standard payline evaluation: Maybe generates 1-2 payline wins
- Scattered evaluation: Three full reels of explorers generate wins across ALL active paylines simultaneously
- Payment: Three-explorer scattered pay × all 9 (or 10) paylines = substantial win
Maximum scenario:
If expanding symbols appear on all five reels, expansion creates entire grid of matching symbols. This generates five-of-a-kind wins across every active payline simultaneously—the absolute maximum outcome approaching 5,000x potential.
Why Symbol Selection Matters Critically
The randomly-selected expanding symbol determines feature value dramatically:
High-value symbol selection (Explorer, Pharaoh):
- Each expansion generates substantial wins through high symbol values
- Three+ reel expansions create massive payouts
- Full-screen scenarios approach maximum 5,000x potential
Low-value symbol selection (10, J, Q):
- Expansions generate modest wins despite scattered pay structure
- Even full-screen scenarios produce disappointing returns relative to high-value alternatives
- Features often fail recovering base game investment reaching trigger
This selection randomness creates feast-or-famine dynamics—identical trigger conditions produce vastly different outcomes purely from expanding symbol selection luck.
Book of Ra Bonus Features Explained
Feature Frequency and Retriggers
Free spins trigger approximately every 150-250 spins based on the 95.10% RTP configuration. This frequency means:
- 200-spin session: 70% chance of 1 feature
- 300-spin session: 85% chance of 1-2 features
The moderate frequency ensures regular features maintaining engagement, though the medium-high volatility permits extended droughts exceeding 300 spins during unfavourable variance.
Features prove retriggerable through landing 3+ scatter books during free spins, awarding 10 additional spins. The unlimited retrigger potential creates occasional extended features continuing substantially beyond 10-spin starting allocation, though typical features complete within 10-20 total spins.
Realistic Feature Outcome Distribution
Based on expanding symbol selection and appearance patterns:
- 50%: Disappointing outcomes (20-80x stake through low-value selections or poor appearances)
- 30%: Decent outcomes (80-300x stake through moderate selections with reasonable appearances)
- 15%: Good outcomes (300-1,000x stake through high-value selections with multiple appearances)
- 5%: Exceptional outcomes (1,000-5,000x through optimal selections with full-screen or near-full-screen scenarios)
Notice how half of features generate disappointing returns failing to recover extended base game investment reaching triggers. This disappointment rate contributes to Book of Ra’s medium-high volatility through concentrated value in rare excellent features offset by frequent modest outcomes.
Book of Ra Volatility Analysis
Book of Ra implements medium-high volatility creating extended dry spells punctuated by feature-driven winning sequences. The volatility profile matches Book of Dead’s patterns closely—both games share equivalent variance characteristics despite differing RTPs.
What this feels like in actual play:
A typical 200-spin session at £1 per spin (£200 total wagered) sees balance fluctuate between £120 and £250. The medium-high volatility creates scenarios where 80-120 consecutive spins produce minimal returns, followed by feature sequences potentially recovering substantial portions or generating profits.
The volatility profile creates scenarios where:
- Extended losing streaks occasionally reach 80-120 consecutive non-winning or minimal-win spins
- Feature activations arrive approximately every 150-250 spins but variance permits 300+ spin droughts
- Balance depletion occurs through accumulated losses during extended dry spells
- Features provide recovery opportunities rather than guaranteed profits—50% generate disappointing returns
- Sessions end from gradual erosion through 4.90% house edge punctuated by feature-driven fluctuations
Compare this to Bonanza’s extreme high volatility. Bonanza creates violent 200+ spin losing streaks punctuated by occasional transformative feature wins. Book of Ra provides steadier medium-high variance where features arrive regularly enough preventing complete psychological devastation whilst maintaining meaningful anticipation.
Realistic session expectations at different spin counts:
200-spin session (£200 wagered at £1 per spin):
- 60% probability: Loss of £25-£60 (1 modest/disappointing feature)
- 30% probability: Small profit £10-£50 (1 decent feature)
- 10% probability: Profit £60-£200 (1 excellent feature)
400-spin session (£400 wagered at £1 per spin):
- 60% probability: Loss of £50-£110 (2-3 modest features)
- 30% probability: Small profit £20-£100 (2-3 decent features)
- 10% probability: Profit £120-£400 (multiple excellent features)
Notice how longer sessions don’t dramatically improve win probabilities—you’re still losing 60% of sessions regardless of duration. The 95.10% RTP operates across millions of spins, not individual sessions. Extended play provides more feature opportunities experiencing variance patterns rather than escaping mathematical reality.
Book of Ra vs Book of Dead: The Critical Comparison
The most important evaluation examines Book of Ra against Book of Dead—the game that refined Book of Ra’s formula whilst achieving superior UK market penetration.
What’s Identical
- Expanding symbol free spins mechanics operate identically
- Medium-high volatility creates equivalent dry spell patterns
- 5,000x maximum win potential
- 10 adjustable paylines with similar symbol configurations
- Egyptian archaeological adventure theme
- Feature frequency approximately 100-250 spins depending on configurations
What’s Different (All Favour Book of Dead)
- RTP: Book of Dead 96.21% vs Book of Ra 95.10% (1.11% advantage = £11.10 less lost per £1,000 wagered)
- Graphics: Book of Dead’s 2016 production vastly superior to Book of Ra’s 2005/2008 visuals
- UK market recognition: Book of Dead dominates UK awareness; Book of Ra remains niche
- Mobile implementation: Book of Dead purpose-built for mobile; Book of Ra adapted from desktop
- Distribution: Book of Dead available everywhere; Book of Ra limited UK presence
The Uncomfortable Truth
Book of Dead surpasses Book of Ra across every measurable dimension except historical precedence. The mechanics operate identically, but Book of Dead implements superior mathematics (96.21% vs 95.10%), modern production values, wider UK distribution, and better mobile functionality.
Choose Book of Ra only if:
- You specifically value historical significance over practical superiority
- Nostalgia drives your choice through personal history with the original
- You’re playing in German-speaking markets where Book of Ra holds cultural significance
- You’ve confirmed playing 97% RTP Book of Ra Deluxe configuration (rare)
Otherwise, Book of Dead represents objectively superior choice implementing identical mechanics with better everything else.
Is Book of Ra Worth Playing?
Book of Ra suits extremely limited player profiles whilst disappointing most.
Play Book of Ra if you:
- Specifically value historical precedence and pioneering mechanics
- Hold nostalgia for 2005-era online slots from personal experience
- Reside in German-speaking markets where Book of Ra holds cultural significance
- Confirmed playing 97% RTP Book of Ra Deluxe (requires verification)
- Want to understand mechanical origins that Book of Dead refined
Avoid Book of Ra if you:
- Prioritise mathematical optimisation (95.10% RTP proves inferior)
- Want modern production values and contemporary graphics
- Prefer wider UK market distribution and availability
- Seek purpose-built mobile implementations
- Value objective superiority over historical significance
The honest verdict: Book of Ra pioneered expanding symbol mechanics that revolutionised Egyptian-themed slots, establishing templates countless games followed. The historical significance proves genuine—this game created the formula Book of Dead, Legacy of Dead, and dozens of others subsequently refined.
However, pioneering innovation doesn’t equal optimal current choice. Book of Dead implements identical mechanics with superior 96.21% RTP (saving £11.10 per £1,000 wagered), modern 2016 production values vastly exceeding Book of Ra’s dated 2005/2008 presentation, wider UK distribution, and purpose-built mobile functionality.
Should you play Book of Ra? Only if nostalgia, historical interest, or German-market cultural significance specifically motivates your choice. For pure entertainment value and mathematical optimisation, Book of Dead represents objectively superior alternative implementing identical mechanics with better everything else.
Book of Ra Bankroll Management
Book of Ra’s medium-high volatility requires substantial bankroll management discipline matching Book of Dead’s demands.
Recommended session coverage: 200-300 spins
Calculate appropriate bet sizing by dividing your session bankroll by 200-300:
- £60 session budget ÷ 200 spins = 30p maximum bet
- £100 session budget ÷ 200 spins = 50p maximum bet
- £150 session budget ÷ 200 spins = 75p maximum bet
- £200 session budget ÷ 200 spins = £1 maximum bet
This coverage accounts for medium-high volatility where 150-250 spin feature triggers occur regularly but variance permits 300+ spin droughts. The 200-300 spin cushion ensures surviving typical dry spells until features trigger, then withstanding poor feature outcomes requiring additional triggers for recovery.
Critical consideration with 95.10% RTP:
The inferior RTP means losing £4.90 per £100 wagered versus Book of Dead’s £3.79. This 30% higher expected loss rate compounds across sessions, requiring either:
- More conservative bet sizing accepting smaller stakes for equivalent bankroll coverage
- Larger session bankrolls funding equivalent bet sizes
- Accepting shorter session durations from equivalent bankrolls
Book of Ra’s 95.10% RTP creates measurable disadvantage requiring adjustment versus 96%+ alternatives.
Book of Ra Mobile Experience
Book of Ra’s mobile implementation proves functional but shows desktop-first origins through adaptation rather than purpose-built mobile design.
Technical performance:
- Display quality: 2005/2008 graphics remain legible at smartphone scales despite dated appearance
- Animation smoothness: Basic animations run adequately across device capabilities
- Interface adaptation: Layout adjusts reasonably for mobile though designed primarily for desktop
- Battery efficiency: Modest graphics demands enable extended sessions
The expanding symbol mechanic translates adequately to mobile through visual clarity ensuring players understand which symbols expand and how wins calculate. The straightforward gameplay—spin, watch for books, experience features—suits mobile engagement without demanding complex multi-stage interactions.
Honest assessment: Book of Ra’s mobile functionality proves acceptable without reaching excellence. Modern alternatives like Book of Dead deliver purpose-built mobile implementations surpassing Book of Ra’s adapted desktop design. For dedicated mobile-first players, Book of Dead’s superior mobile execution provides better experience implementing identical mechanics.
Playing Book of Ra with Bonus Funds
Book of Ra appears infrequently in UK casino welcome bonuses compared to Book of Dead due to Novomatic’s limited UK distribution versus Play’n GO’s ubiquitous presence.
How Book of Ra performs for wagering requirement clearance:
The 95.10% RTP means losing £4.90 per £100 wagered through wagering requirements. On a £100 bonus with 35x wagering (£3,500 total wagering required), expect approximately £171.50 lost purely to RTP operation before completing requirements.
Compare to Book of Dead (96.21% RTP) costing £132.65 through identical requirements—£38.85 more expensive purely from inferior mathematics. This substantial difference makes Book of Ra objectively worse choice for bonus wagering when alternatives offering 96%+ RTP prove available.
Critical consideration: Always verify game weighting in bonus terms and confirm actual RTP configuration. If playing reduced-RTP version (94% implementations exist), costs escalate further. If Book of Ra Deluxe implements 97% configuration (rare), it surpasses alternatives—but confirming configuration proves essential.
Honest recommendation: Choose 96%+ RTP alternatives for bonus wagering unless specifically constrained to Book of Ra. The 95.10% RTP creates measurable disadvantage costing £30-40 additional per typical wagering requirement versus superior mathematics options.
Responsible Gambling Considerations
Book of Ra’s medium-high volatility creates specific responsible gambling considerations:
The expanding symbol lottery effect:
Features where poor expanding symbol selections (low-value symbols) generate disappointing returns despite extended base game investment reaching triggers create particular frustration. This outcome randomness—where identical trigger conditions produce vastly different results purely from selection luck—can feel especially unfair, driving “just one more feature” chasing behaviour pursuing better selections.
The “due feature” fallacy:
Extended 250+ spin dry spells create strong psychological pressure that features feel “due” despite each spin maintaining identical independent trigger probability. Monitor whether dry spells trigger chasing behaviour increasing stakes or extending sessions beyond predetermined limits pursuing anticipated triggers that remain probabilistically unchanged.
Nostalgia-driven extended play:
For players with personal history with Book of Ra during 2000s-era online gambling, nostalgia can enable extended sessions through emotional attachment transcending pure entertainment value. Maintain clear boundaries between nostalgic appreciation and problematic extended engagement, recognising when historical sentiment enables harmful play patterns.
Mathematical reality acceptance:
The 95.10% RTP means losing £4.90 per £100 wagered over sufficient play. This 30% higher expected loss versus 96%+ alternatives compounds across extended engagement. Accept that choosing Book of Ra over mathematically-superior options costs measurably more through inferior RTP operation.
Support resources:
- BeGambleAware: www.begambleaware.org
- National Gambling Helpline: 0808 8020 133 (free, confidential, 24/7)
- GamCare: www.gamcare.org.uk
- GAMSTOP (self-exclusion): www.gamstop.co.uk
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the RTP of Book of Ra slot?
Book of Ra offers 95.10% RTP in standard configurations, meaning £95.10 returned per £100 wagered over millions of spins. This translates to £4.90 expected loss per £100 wagered. Book of Ra Deluxe permits operators configuring RTP from 95.10% through 97.00%, though most implement lower settings. The 95.10% standard sits 0.90-1.40% below contemporary alternatives like Book of Dead (96.21%), creating substantial value disadvantage—approximately £11.10 more lost per £1,000 wagered compared to Book of Dead purely from inferior mathematics.
What is the maximum win on Book of Ra?
Book of Ra’s maximum win reaches 5,000x stake through optimal feature combinations where high-value expanding symbols appear on all five reels repeatedly throughout extended features. This maximum matches Book of Dead’s 5,000x potential identically. Achieving maximum requires exceptional circumstances—high-value symbol selection as expander coinciding with appearances on all five reels across multiple feature spins, potentially with retriggers extending sessions. Realistic excellent features typically generate 500-2,000x stake, with 5,000x representing theoretical peak occurring perhaps 1 in 50,000-100,000 features.
How often does the Book of Ra free spins feature trigger?
Book of Ra free spins trigger approximately every 150-250 spins based on standard 95.10% RTP configuration. This means 200-spin sessions typically include 1 feature, whilst 400-spin sessions feature 2-3 triggers. However, variance permits extended droughts exceeding 300 spins or clustering multiple features within short sequences. The moderate frequency prevents extreme dry spells whilst maintaining sufficient rarity that feature activations feel special rather than routine. This frequency matches Book of Dead’s patterns closely—both games share equivalent variance characteristics.
Is Book of Ra a high or medium volatility slot?
Book of Ra implements medium-high volatility creating extended dry spells punctuated by feature-driven winning sequences. Balance typically fluctuates between 60% and 125% of starting amounts during 200-spin sessions. This volatility level sits between medium variance (steady play with 40-50% hit frequency) and extreme high volatility (violent swings with 10-15% hit frequency). The medium-high positioning demands 200-300 spin bankroll coverage whilst avoiding the extreme psychological pressure that Bonanza-level variance creates. This volatility matches Book of Dead precisely—both games share equivalent variance patterns.
Can I play Book of Ra on mobile?
Yes. Book of Ra functions adequately on mobile through modern HTML5 adaptations, though the implementation shows desktop-first origins rather than purpose-built mobile design. The 2005/2008 graphics remain legible at smartphone scales, animations run smoothly across device capabilities, and the straightforward gameplay suits mobile engagement. However, the mobile experience proves inferior to purpose-built alternatives like Book of Dead which deliver superior mobile implementations. For dedicated mobile-first players, Book of Dead’s mobile execution provides better experience implementing identical mechanics with modern mobile optimisation.
Is Book of Ra good for clearing wagering requirements?
No. Book of Ra proves inferior for wagering requirement clearance due to 95.10% RTP creating higher expected losses (£4.90 per £100 wagered) versus 96%+ alternatives. On £100 bonus with 35x wagering, expect approximately £171.50 lost through requirements—£38.85 more than Book of Dead’s £132.65 purely from inferior mathematics. Choose 96%+ RTP alternatives for bonus wagering unless specifically constrained to Book of Ra. The only exception involves rare 97% RTP Book of Ra Deluxe configurations which surpass alternatives, though confirming configuration proves essential as most operators implement lower settings.
Should I choose Book of Ra or Book of Dead?
Choose Book of Dead unless nostalgia, historical interest, or German-market cultural significance specifically motivates your choice. Book of Dead implements identical expanding symbol mechanics with superior 96.21% RTP (saving £11.10 per £1,000 wagered), modern 2016 production values vastly exceeding Book of Ra’s dated 2005/2008 presentation, wider UK distribution, and purpose-built mobile functionality. Book of Ra pioneered the formula but Book of Dead refined it with better everything except historical precedence. The only scenario favouring Book of Ra involves confirmed 97% RTP Deluxe configurations which surpass Book of Dead mathematically, though verifying configuration proves essential as most implementations use lower settings.
Why is Book of Ra so popular if Book of Dead is better?
Book of Ra achieved legendary status across German-speaking European markets (Germany, Austria) through fortuitous timing during mid-2000s digital gambling transition, creating first-mover brand advantage that mathematical disadvantages cannot overcome for established player bases. The game holds genuine cultural significance in specific markets where it became synonymous with online slots, sustaining popularity through nostalgia and regional brand recognition transcending objective quality. However, UK markets favour Book of Dead which refined Book of Ra’s formula with superior execution. Book of Ra’s popularity proves regionally-specific rather than universal, demonstrating how cultural timing and brand establishment create value independent from technical specifications.
Final Verdict: Book of Ra pioneered expanding symbol mechanics revolutionising Egyptian-themed slots, establishing templates that Book of Dead, Legacy of Dead, and countless others subsequently refined. The 2005 release achieved legendary status across German-speaking European markets through fortuitous timing during digital gambling transition, building devoted player bases sustaining popularity nearly 20 years through nostalgia and cultural brand recognition transcending technical specifications. However, historical significance doesn’t equal optimal current choice—Book of Dead implements identical expanding symbol free spins mechanics with superior 96.21% RTP (saving £11.10 per £1,000 wagered versus Book of Ra’s inferior 95.10%), modern 2016 production values vastly exceeding dated 2005/2008 graphics, wider UK market distribution, and purpose-built mobile functionality. Understanding Book of Ra’s characteristics—pioneering mechanical innovation creating industry-standard template, inferior mathematics costing measurably more through 4.90% expected losses per £100 wagered, medium-high volatility demanding 200-300 spin coverage matching Book of Dead’s variance patterns, and regional popularity concentrated in German-speaking markets rather than UK mainstream—helps determine whether nostalgia and historical appreciation justify choosing the original over objectively-superior refinements that maintained identical mechanics whilst improving literally everything else.
Need help? Contact the National Gambling Helpline: 0808 8020 133 (free, confidential, 24/7)
Visit BeGambleAware.org | GamCare.org.uk | GAMSTOP.co.uk